• strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /var/www/freeasinkittens.com/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_argument::init() should be compatible with views_handler::init(&$view, $options) in /var/www/freeasinkittens.com/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_argument.inc on line 0.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_validate() should be compatible with views_handler::options_validate($form, &$form_state) in /var/www/freeasinkittens.com/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 0.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_submit() should be compatible with views_handler::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in /var/www/freeasinkittens.com/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_filter.inc on line 0.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter_node_status::operator_form() should be compatible with views_handler_filter::operator_form(&$form, &$form_state) in /var/www/freeasinkittens.com/sites/all/modules/views/modules/node/views_handler_filter_node_status.inc on line 0.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /var/www/freeasinkittens.com/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_style_default::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /var/www/freeasinkittens.com/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_style_default.inc on line 0.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in /var/www/freeasinkittens.com/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 0.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /var/www/freeasinkittens.com/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/views_plugin_row.inc on line 0.

Virus hidden as Facebook Application?

A friend complained on facebook today about an application called PicDoodle that she had installed.

It was supposed to give her a way of drawing fancy things on images and share that fun with her friends.

Instead, she got one of her images with a roughly scrawled heart on the corner and it automatically has been taking names from her friends list and "tagging" the image with their names.

When one of those friends goes to see what they've been tagged in, you end up being told that to see the real fun you have to install PicDoodle too, after installing PicDoodle you apparently don't see anything different but you now have a picDoodle post that starts tagging your friends to get them to install PicDoodle.

So, from what I can find out and from what I've seen so far I can only assume that PicDoodle is essentially a virus, or Trojan horse. It exists to mine the data in your account and share it with whoever wrote the application.

Does this make picDoodle the first successful example of a data-mining privacy violating virus hiding itself as a fun facebook app?

from what I can find, it's the perfect example of why I never allow apps access to my account, no quizzes, no superpokes, no steal my friends list to con them into installing an app that will steal their friends list to con them...

If you're on facebook, go to http://www.facebook.com/apps/application.php?id=35731868204 to block the application from ever accessing your data.


info on how to uninstall PicDoodle can be found here http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=76716075179

It might be a virus, it might just be a "mistake" as the press release circulating from the folks that made the application says, as they move as fast as possible trying to cover their asses. My vote is still for malicious over mistake. but either way it's a dangerous app that should be avoided

[second update]
I think this is the best summary of the issue I've read so far PicDoodle virus shows Facebook’s true colors


I am already very sick of this and it's misleading info. Why can't face book get the clue and block crap that harasses us or is outright FAKE!

Not the first

I've seen a number of similarly annoying applications. For example, for a while it was common for an application to require you to invite some number of your friends to also use the application before you could begin to use it yourself. Periodically, after public outcry, specific strategies have become banned. But it's still Facebook that sets the terms; another example of the drawbacks of a private corner of the internet managed by and for one corporation. My favourite analogy to explain this to non-technical friends is that Facebook is to the internet what the food court of a shopping mall is to a public park -- at first it looks like public space but if you interfere with the owner's profit motive, you won't be there long.

Bad Face Book App

One of my colleagues installed the PicDoodle Application, and saw similar results. It started tagging random people to random pictures. I don't possess a technical background, but I would assume Facebook slipped up on letting this application through their moderation process. I've heard of people's accounts being hacked because users input private data on sites that look like a link they clicked...but to allow a malicious app through the moderation process is on Facebook.

Frank Brown
Immigration lawyer
Seattle, WA

Thanks for the great tips. I

Thanks for the great tips. I am using facebook for quite a long time but I had never met anything like this. I don't understand why people are doing those things. I mean why they are creating those Trojan horses and viruses? I know that they can steal a valuable information from your computer using Trojans, for example your bank or credit card information. But what is the point of those Trojans in facebook? To get my account information? And what they will do with that information, I can't get it at all. But unfortunately there exists such dummies.. Thanks one more time for the great tip, I will be more careful in my facebook account after reading it. Oh and I will be looking forward to other great articles from you in the future.


Kevin Tillson (from application development services)

facebook community pages might need some rewording

By now, I'm sure you are all aware of the storm of criticism and concern about privacy that has come about in response to the badly thought out addition of Community Pages at Facebook.

Like many others, I've deleted a lot of information from my profile. I did not want to link my profile to these pages that are accessible to anyone on facebook, and in some cases anyone on the internet. After my initial freakout, I have calmed down a bit. It seems that by limiting my participation in facebook as a whole, I can keep a certain level of privacy.

One friend told me a story of a musician friend of hers who has been impacted by this new feature in a rather negative way. Her fan page is now overshadowed by the community page that has her name. Where she once had a place for her fans that she could moderate, most people now end up at the fully un-moderated aggregation of posts that mention her that is the facebook community page. They have essentially replaced a well defined relatively safe space with a free for all with content that would never have been allowed on her fan page.

Another problem is the text on the top of every community page. It assumes and implies that anyone who's liked the page or had their status update automatically posted to it have "a passion" for the topic.

Imagine my shock when I saw an anarchist activist friend's recent status update on the FBI community page. Now, he might have a passion for the FBI, but hardly in the way implied by facebook.

Prompted by the wave of criticism, the New York Times gave readers the chance to submit questions that would be asked to a Facebook executive. The responses from Elliot Schrage, vice president for public policy at Facebook show a clear disrespect for the people who's participation in facebook gives it the value that drives the business side of facebook. I have to wonder if Mr. Schrage understands that his paycheck is the result of the combined crowdsourced labor of people using Facebook.

The most telling answer came when a reader asked:

Why not simply set everything up for opt-in rather than opt-out? Facebook seems to assume that users generally want all the details of their private lives made public.

Mr. Schrage replied:

Everything is opt-in on Facebook. Participating in the service is a choice. We want people to continue to choose Facebook every day. Adding information — uploading photos or posting status updates or “like” a Page — are also all opt-in. Please don’t share if you’re not comfortable. That said, we certainly will continue to work to improve the ease and access of controls to make more people more comfortable. Your assumption about our assumption is simply incorrect. We don’t believe that. We’re happy to make the record on that clear.

So, by opting into facebook by creating an account, you have opted into any and all future changes to privacy settings. This is an amazing interpretation of the concept of opt-out that the question was trying to bring up. Thank you for putting that on the record.

In order to illustrate how badly thought out their new methods are, I went looking for examples where it would be clear that people who's posts were being added to a page might have reservations about being listed as "having a passion" for a certain topic. Here are the winners for now:

Now, I have a passion for abortion rights, but I don't think anyone has a passion for abortion:

Notice that the abortion page is the only one of this set that has an image. A small subset of these community pages have a tab with the associated wikipedia entry. Those pages use the primary image used on the wikipedia page. If I did not want to be banned from editing wikipedia pages, I'd start changing those images to rather inappropriate things and see how fast the new images are picked up on facebook. (well, now that I'm thinking about it, I'm not sure if that's really an appropriate image for the wikipedia entry about abortion, but I'll save the rest of this for another post)

Someone please tell Facebook we already have an Internet

I have a whole set of critiques of facebook's privacy policy/changes, but one of the things I immediately noticed about the whole "community page" phenomenon is how very wrong they are doing it. Any mention of genital warts or the FBI translates to "passion" for same? Is that really how Facebook's engineers think the world works?

They've also slurped up a huge amount of Wikipedia content, and while the "edit" links all point back to the original, they don't seem to have worked out Wikipedia's system of redirects. On the real deal, Baratunde redirects to Baratunde Thurston. On Facebook's version of the internet, those are two different pages:
* http://www.facebook.com/pages/Baratunde/101876586521217
* http://www.facebook.com/pages/Baratunde-Thurston/105631819470600

Or, as he put it, "Someone please tell Facebook we already have an Internet" (http://www.baratunde.com/blog/2010/5/13/i-was-about-to-delete-my-faceboo...)

The abortion image comes from the wiki page of the same name, and it fascinates me. It led me to another image which is at once gross, and still mesmerizing. I've never given much thought to what is cropped from your average fetus photo. I'm so used to seeing floating sacks. It actually never properly occurred to me that we actually don't spend our first weeks floating in a slick balloon, but rather in ... what is that? a beat up old tennis ball? Seriously: it had never occurred to me that the amniotic sac is so ... intense. Anyway. That's my tangent for the day.

if you have a passion for telling facebook...

That's a great quote from Baratunde, thanks for posting it. On the whole fetus/placenta thing, my illusions of placenta as slick balloon were crushed when Vikki at abc no rio brought Siu Loong's placenta to the silk screen room to make placenta prints. Biology is just so icky

I recently decided to

I recently decided to de-facebook myself, and I've been planning a rant giving reasons why. Now I have more material to use -- thanks.